dear jack

?

jack - sure a lot of collaboration and reality communications are needed - but i would like to start by clarifying 2 systemic issues because my approach is less formulaic and more about setting up a game anyone concerned with freeing any greatest future purpose can Q&A (-think of whatever is the biggest market sector in your world- through time does, it lead-action-learn to the most exciting pro-youth purpose at every locality youth's productivity, knowledge networking could linkin - if not how uneconomic! how rotten can branding/media/mediating professionals get)

?

a game mostofa and i are helping japan to renew as the only nation that ever discovered multi-win trade models of fast changing (moores law accelerating) tech sectors is find 5000 youth whose collaborations can build wordlwide economy faster than any 5000 big bankers traders can collapse it (without japans above zero sum economics in 3rd quarter of 20th c , asia pacific region would be where it is now)

ISSUE 1 i have revisited my dad's life work at The Economist -which he first saw 500 youth interact around an electronic learning network in 1972 - converges on how to change ruling systems -change economics, professions, edu, media -? if we want net generation to be most productive time for worldwide youth everywhere -something that million times more collaboration technology than when we raced to moon in 1960s could easily make possible

?

keynes who mentored dad wrote that the greatest compound risk to youth's futures is elderly macroeconomists whose top-down viewpoint tends not to notice when something has changed even as they hire themselves out to bigger and bigger powers that want to rule the word-? (some of the errors still destructing world economic system are attached)

?

?

its quite easy to create 3 billion jobs around young people but only by valuing other way round systems from the 3 forces old economists devalue every quarter, namely

1 they dont search for multi-win models essential to valuing collab technology and the abundance of knowhow multiplying value in use (opposite of scarcity of consuming things); they externalise, separate, box in what most needs to flow -if the only metric you look at (as eg ratings agencies do) is how much has one side extracted from others then that is promoting the least sustainable maths in the world - too big to fail means too big (too many unseen risks in the foundations) for man to have built in a world where nature chooses to extinguish any species too big for her multi-win game of expoential impacts

?

2 by excluding from their numbers polution and other costs of waste they destroy the case for green and banish any modlelling of expoential impacts- worse we need to get on to the pathway of photosyntheseis not nuclear but get further away from that because of governance by models that dont include what risk we compound on our children's children

?

3 by not valuing productivity of family and real communitty infrastructures we end up with at least one in three children being born into places that give little chance to grow up safely and smartly; and we also cause extraordinary bubbles in education which isnt in most western places run by people whose main purpose is helping youth create jobs; indeed father had argued that a knowledge age gets back to not losing anything your family of local culture knows even if that means belnding some work as soon as you have primary literacy - all the exact opposite to a system of government that separates schools from communities and where passisg exams on top-down standards is the only metric the whole system ses itself however big a loan students have to take out

?

(aside but not aside3 -how did top-down ruled americans use computers to become the least maths literate nation ever - if there was only one great maths finding in 20th c it was einstein - go more micro to innovate because any science has far more to discover when it models interactions at a greater level of detail than scientists previousl assumed)

?

ISSUE 2 back in 1990 i worked at one of the big 5 acountants and attended many of their debates on not knowing how to measure goodwill - they chose an exact oposite path of what dad and I would have - goodwill can be valued as the extent to which a company's purspoe has a multi-win model and is transparent aboyut this; moreover if a company is led that way it suddently see panerships in a whole diferent light which is necessary if in a globl age no single organisation can serve anythinwithout seamless partners

?

goodwill isnt hard to model but it is contextual, devillish in detail - just like the moves of chess are not hard to list but the combinatorial pro-activity of many moves ahead is the hard part -

?

it turns out that the pivotal question to valuing goodwill (purposeful systems maxising postive human relationship energies) and multi-win models is chartering question- simply who would uniquely miss what if this didnt exis?t- as well as probing by stakeholder demands such as society, owners. customers, employees, business partners, the world's youth,? you can also question by different ways productivity is inputted - eg are passionate people's personal networks linked into the way the company innovates

I am a cambridge university ma in statistics - facilitating multi-win modeling doesnt begin wih defining the formula- all the logics we need to make net generationn most productive and sustainble time for youh everywhere exist if we get back to investing in youth's milennium goals but that isnt what economic advisers to national politicians or other top-down powers are doing with numbers they rule over; as you may know in spain and greece already the majority of young people have been put oit of work because of badwill investments their elders met- this is crininal at a time when any place has investment opportunities in 10 times more productive youth! and of course there has never been a less economic currency system that the euro the way brussels and germany and switzerland rule it - it was swiss bankers rules out of basle who said any bank needed less liquidity provided it maximised its investment in property - why arent they sued for causing such insanity? why is the bill left to spanish youth to pay?

?

- so called ruling macroeconomists have become the least eocnomical? (most youth destructing people) on earth by my dad's and keynes and the economists's 1843 founder's entrepreneurial definition of the purpose of economics being investing in next generation's productivity out of every community

?

in new zealand/OZ area you have 2 outstanding network educational movements

gordon at www.thelearningweb.net

and zoe at www.10thousandgirl.com

think of the question of how to popularsie- connect more people actioning what these two peer networks know how to do- i dont think a financial formula is what comes first; think of innovation p-ast what conflicts have to be removed so these movements have free speech against the conventional monopoloies governing in these areas - the chalenge my mate harrison owen -and his aliumnu network the world over -? at www.openspaceworld.com have helped system transformation people host for 30 years now -when he presenetd this most open innovation method in 1984 to those who define us mba curricula he was told harrison you may be right but if so that would make 95% of what we etach wrong so go away..

?

at the same time given any purposeful case? - once all involved have charrterd who are all the constiuencies (and their unique valuations of trust) to put into their win-win model, then any mathematician and? i can tdefine an audit and the adaptive maths needed to continuosly see if they are doing that with ever greater focus each cycle -key to that is using the operand multiply -eg if you destroy the trust/goodwill of one constituency who has spent or needed their life connected to you , the maths is you zeroise everything- this is not how bean counters use the operand add to add up bottom lines;

?

every institute of accountability, intellectual capital , brand valuation algorithm, adding up triple bottom line i have seen in last 20 years fudges this by ultimately trying to make its numbers subjugate to the global accountatns - which is a certain way of not getting to youth's most productive time, and will in fact spin globalisation george orwell's unsustainable way

incidentally while it turns out that grassroots bangladesh has 41 years experience of building investment banks around 15 million poorest village mothers needs? - that are purer in investing communally in youth than any other dynamic currently searchable on this planet? - yunus has got trapped in so many conflicts that really only sir fazle abed at www.brac.net? is left to help open source the experiences that bangladesh has been leader of in turning villages into mobile-urgent-knowhow connectivity labs since 1996

?

- mostofa tries to get japan embassy to convene quarterly roundtables on this since sir fazle cares desperately about succession of his knowhow and relationhsip contacts being passed on - so he is also central to choosing the 5000 youth who can

?

Last CALL- the time to fix this doesnt come again

?

chris

http://www.huoliu21.top/

..